Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed23 June 20223274284

Kings Field, Moor Road, Banwell, BS29 6ET

creation of 1no. traveller and gypsy caravan pitch together with the formation of hardstanding and the erection of a day room and stables

Authority
North Somerset Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Nicholls H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the Appellant is a ‘traveller’ as defined by the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites: Annex 1 (2015) (PPTS)
  • whether the location of the site accords with local and national policies with regard to access to facilities and limiting the need to travel by private vehicle
  • the need for pitches for Gypsies and Travellers in the area
  • the effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would be at risk of flooding and if so, whether it could be made safe over its lifetime

What decided it

The absence of a five year deliverable supply of traveller pitches, combined with the family's personal circumstances and the best interests of the children, outweighed the identified harms sufficiently to justify a three year temporary permission rather than dismissal.

The combined harm from unsustainable location, limited landscape harm and flood risk outweighed other considerations on a permanent basis, but the lack of a five year supply of deliverable traveller pitches and the family's personal circumstances outweighed the harms to justify a three year temporary permission instead.

Plan policies cited: Policy CS14, Policy CS33, Policy CS18, Policy CS5, Policy CS3, Policy DM10, Policy DM32

Judgments cited: Wheatcroft Ltd V SSE [1982]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.