Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 November 20213274370

88 Dorothy Road, LEICESTER, LE5 5DQ

an existing dwelling, dormer and single storey rear extension

Authority
Leicester City Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Phillips A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision to refuse to issue a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded, turning on whether the erection of the building has been undertaken in accordance with permission 20180137 and whether the single storey rear extension and dormer are permitted development by virtue of Article 3 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 as amended

What decided it

The Council's evidence that the dwelling, dormer and single storey rear extension were completed as a single operation, combined with the appellant's failure to demonstrate that the original dwelling was substantially completed in accordance with the approved scheme before the extensions were started, meant that permission 20180137 was not lawfully implemented and permitted development rights could not apply.

Judgments cited: Gabbitas v SSE & Newham LBC [1985] JPL 630; Ewen Developments v SSE & North Norfolk DC [1980] JPL 404; Sage v SSETR & Maidstone BC [2003] UKHL 22; Impey v SSE & Lake District SPB [1981] JPL 363; [1984] P&CR 157; Welwyn Hatfield BC v SSCLG & Beesley [2011] UKSC 15

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.