Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 February 20223274394

Garage Adjacent to 9 Devonshire Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5HQ

Planning appeal 3274394 at Garage Adjacent to 9 Devonshire Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5HQ (London Borough of Sutton) was dismissed on 3 February 2022 by Inspector Law T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would provide for a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers with regard to internal and external amenity space.

the change of use of existing detached garage to residential use to provide a one person studio unit involving a front extension, mezzanine floor and rear balcony

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Law T
Postcode
SM2 5HQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would provide for a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers with regard to internal and external amenity space
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal provides sufficient information regarding carbon reduction and climate change

What decided it

The proposed development would provide inadequate internal and external amenity space that would result in unsatisfactory living conditions for future occupiers and a cramped form of development harmful to the character and appearance of the area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 9Policy 1Policy 28Policy 31Policy 32Policy 33London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy SI2London Plan Policy SI3London Plan Policy SI5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

205 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Sutton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266002198
    103 Marlow Drive, North Cheam, SM3 9BD
  2. Allowed15 October 20266009820
    Grass Verge of Sparrow Farm Road, London, KT17 2DF
  3. Dismissed27 August 20266005269
    85 Priory Road, North Cheam, SM3 8LY
  4. Dismissed7 August 20266008124
    3 Carshalton Grove, Sutton, SM1 4LY
  5. Dismissed27 July 20266006764
    136 Grove Road, Sutton, Sutton, SM1 2DF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.