Planning appeal decision
86 Church Street, Whitstable, CT5 1PF
Planning appeal 3274549 at 86 Church Street, Whitstable, CT5 1PF (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 30 November 2021 by Inspector Wallis D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area.
erection of 3 bed chalet bungalow with associated parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wallis D
- Postcode
- CT5 1PF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area
- the safety of the public highway
- protected species and their habitats
- the integrity of the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay Special Protection Area and the Thames, Medway and Swale Special Protection Area (the SPAs)
What decided it
The fundamental loss of protected open space designated under Policy OS9, combined with unresolved highway safety concerns and inadequate ecological information, rendered the proposal contrary to the development plan.
Even if the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework applied due to housing land supply concerns, the environmental limb of sustainability was failed by the proposal's conflicts with open space protection and ecology policies, which provided clear reasons for refusal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy OS9Policy DBE3Policy LB9Policy SP1Policy SP6Policy LB5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Court of Justice of the European Union 2018 ruling on European Sites and Appropriate Assessment
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Canterbury City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed28 September 20266008107Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
- Dismissed28 September 20266008105Dane Cottage, Hogg Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
- Allowed24 September 2026601061482 Island Wall, Whitstable, CT5 1EL
- Allowed18 September 20266009081Ground Floor, 2 Douglas Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6AE
- Dismissed11 August 2026600962869 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®