Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 August 20213274846

47 Shepiston Lane, Hayes, UB3 1LJ

Planning appeal 3274846 at 47 Shepiston Lane, Hayes, UB3 1LJ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 12 August 2021 by Inspector Mulloy C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area.

erection of ground floor side and part first floor extension in tandem with 49 Shepiston Lane

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Mulloy C
Postcode
UB3 1LJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposal would dominate the original dwelling and fail to appear subservient to it, whilst also exceeding the return building line and causing a loss of openness on the prominent corner, thereby conflicting with the development plan policies that collectively seek to ensure high standards of development harmonising with local context.

The benefits of providing additional living accommodation in an accessible location were outweighed by the significant harm identified to the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 1 – Strategic Policies (2019)Policy DMHD 1 of the Council's Local Plan Part Two – Development Management PoliciesPolicy DMHB 11 of the Local Plan Part Two – Development Management PoliciesPolicy DMHB 12 of the Local Plan Part Two – Development Management Policies

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

264 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266015310
    4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266011782
    25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011268
    364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
  5. Allowed6 October 20266013858
    88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.