Planning appeal decision
Outwood, Riding Mill, Northumberland, NE44 6AD
Planning appeal 3274853 at Outwood, Riding Mill, Northumberland, NE44 6AD (Northumberland County Council) was dismissed on 7 October 2021 by Inspector Chukwujekwu I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy.
construction of a new sunroom
- Authority
- Northumberland County Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Chukwujekwu I
- Postcode
- NE44 6AD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy
- The effect of the development on openness of the Green Belt
- If the development is inappropriate, is the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, does this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause material harm to openness, with no other considerations advanced that would clearly outweigh this harm, and therefore very special circumstances do not exist.
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness was not outweighed by any other considerations, and very special circumstances were not demonstrated.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy NE7Policy GD2Policy H20Policy NE14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 47Paragraph 149Paragraph 147
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Northumberland County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed28 October 20266011490Land North West of Ivy Cottage, Whittonstall, DH8 9JN
- Dismissed16 October 2026601049113 Park Drive, Hepscott Park, Morpeth, NE61 6QA
- Dismissed13 October 20266009232Land East of Monks Lodge, Mitford, NE61 2YJ
- Dismissed29 September 202660126272 Dilston West Cottages, Corbridge, NE45 5RL
- Allowed9 September 20266007219Breckon Hill, Lowgate, Hexham, NE46 2NL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®