Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 September 20213274934

48 Central Road, Worcester Park, KT4 8HY

Planning appeal 3274934 at 48 Central Road, Worcester Park, KT4 8HY (London Borough of Sutton) was dismissed on 15 September 2021 by Inspector Sabu R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

described as, ‘single storey rear extension, new one bed flat with associated refuse and recycle bins and cycle parking

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Sabu R
Postcode
KT4 8HY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide a suitable living environment for future occupiers with regard to outlook
  • whether the proposed development would accord with the Council's development plan strategy for carbon emissions and water efficiency

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area through the overly large, blank-walled building diminishing the spacious quality of the rear development pattern, combined with the failure to provide a suitable living environment for future occupiers due to limited outlook.

The benefits of housing supply were outweighed by the unacceptable harm to character and appearance and the failure to provide a suitable living environment for future occupiers.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 28Policy 29Policy 31Policy 32Policy 33London Plan Policy D1London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy SI 2London Plan Policy SI 13

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

205 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Sutton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266002198
    103 Marlow Drive, North Cheam, SM3 9BD
  2. Allowed25 June 20263371477
    79-85 Beddington Lane, Beddington , Sutton, CR0 4TH
  3. Dismissed18 September 20253365663
    Land to Rear of 81 Kingsmead Avenue, Worcester Park, London, KT4 8UZ
  4. Dismissed14 August 20253364800
    60 Waverley Avenue, Sutton, SM1 3JY
  5. Allowed28 April 20253353135
    231 Woodcote Road, Purley, CR8 3PB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.