Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 September 20213275014

1 & 2 Park Cottages, Arthington Lane, Arthington, OTLEY, LS21 1PJ

described on the application form as ‘infill rear two storey extension

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Coyne C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would represent inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
  • if the proposed development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposed extensions would increase the original building's volume by approximately 50%, exceeding the 30% threshold in Policy HDG3 and constituting a disproportionate addition that represents inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with no very special circumstances to justify it.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt caused by the inappropriateness of the development and its impact on openness was not clearly outweighed by the limited weight afforded to design quality and material matching, and very special circumstances did not exist.

Framework references: 137, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy HDG3 of the Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.