Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20213275267

103 Elgin Crescent, LONDON, W11 2JF

The construction of a single-storey basement structure under the existing footprint of the house and of the new proposed side addition, extending in part under the rear garden. A single-storey side and rear extension at lower ground floor level as well as the rebuilding of the mansard roof to include an attic floor level together with associated external and internal alterations

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Scott A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Ladbroke Conservation Area

What decided it

The extent of harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the paired bookend relationship between the two end-of-terrace houses, which would not be justified by the modest public benefits of the proposal.

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Ladbroke Conservation Area was weighed against modest public benefits including reinstatement of balustrades and energy efficiency gains; the harm substantially outweighed the benefits.

Framework references: 200

Plan policies cited: CL1, CL3, CL8, CL9, CL11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.