Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld1 October 20213275385

Parcel 4481 Ramscombe Lane , Batheaston , Bath , BA1 8EP

without planning permission the erection of two detached buildings

Authority
Bath and North East Somerset Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Harwood A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If there would be harm by reason of inappropriateness and openness, would that be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The building is used substantially for social and leisure purposes rather than purely for agriculture, making it inappropriate development in the Green Belt that causes harm to openness, with no very special circumstances to justify it.

The substantial weight given to harm from inappropriateness and harm to openness of the Green Belt was not clearly outweighed by any other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist.

Plan policies cited: CP8, RE2

Judgments cited: R. (on the application of Lee Valley Regional Park Authority) v Epping Forest District Council and Valley Grown Nurseries Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 404

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.