Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld15 November 20213275552

Land at 10 Kings Hill, Beech, ALTON, GU34 4AL

without planning permission, the material change of use from agriculture to residential and the erection of a building for residential purposes

Authority
East Hampshire District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hawkins S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the building is a suitable form of development in the countryside, having regard to the Development Plan and the Framework
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside
  • If there is conflict with the Development Plan and the Framework, whether this is outweighed by other considerations

What decided it

The building is not a suitable form of development in the countryside contrary to the Development Plan spatial strategy and causes unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside, which cannot be outweighed by the personal circumstances of the occupier.

The personal circumstances of the building's occupier weighed slightly in favour of granting permission, but this was outweighed by the building's unsuitability as countryside development, the unacceptable harm to character and appearance, and the conflict with the Development Plan and Framework.

Framework references: 8, 56, 80

Plan policies cited: Policy CP19, Policy CP10, Policy CP14, Policy CP12, Policy CP20, Policy CP29, Policy H14, Policy BPC02, Policy BPC06

Judgments cited: Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keens [1949] 1 KB 385; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSTER (No 2) [2000] 2 PLR 102; Measor v SSETR & Tunbridge Wells DC [1999] JPL 182; R (aoa Save Woolley Valley Action Group Ltd) v Bath and North East Somerset Council [2012] EWHC 2161 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.