Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld15 November 20213275554

Land at 10 Kings Hill, Beech, ALTON, GU34 4AL

without planning permission, the material change of use of the land from agriculture to recreational amenity land

Authority
East Hampshire District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Hawkins S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether it was too late to take enforcement action against the breach of planning control (ground d)
  • Whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach (ground f)
  • Whether the time specified for compliance falls short of what should reasonably be allowed (ground g)

What decided it

The appellants failed to prove on the balance of probability that the unauthorised use had subsisted for ten continuous years, and the gazebo and decking were integral to the unauthorised use and required to be removed to remedy the breach.

Judgments cited: Moore v SSCLG [2012] EWCA Civ 1202; Murfitt v SSE [1980] JPL 598; Somak Travel v SSE & Brent LBC [1987] JPL 630; Newbury DC v SSE & Mallaburn [1994] JPL 879; Welwyn Hatfield BC v SSCLG & Beesley [2011] UKSC 15; Kestrel Hydro v SSCLG & Spelthorne BC [2016] EWCA Civ 784

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.