Planning appeal decision
22 Becket Wood, Newdigate, Dorking, RH5 5AQ
Planning appeal 3275595 at 22 Becket Wood, Newdigate, Dorking, RH5 5AQ (Mole Valley District Council) was allowed on 25 September 2021 by Inspector Lawrence E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 and development plan policy.
a part garage conversion and first floor extension
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Lawrence E
- Postcode
- RH5 5AQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 and development plan policy
- If the proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the street scene
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 23 Becket Wood, with particular regard to daylight, sunlight and visual impact
- If the proposal amounts to inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, including any public benefits, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal does not constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt as the extension, together with the existing extension, would not amount to disproportionate additions over and above the size of the original dwelling.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy RUD7Policy ENV22Policy ENV24Policy CS14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 12
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®