Planning appeal decision
Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
Planning appeal 6005433 at Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 9 September 2026 by Inspector B Pattison, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Retention of two containers used for storage purposes
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- other
- Inspector
- B Pattison
- Postcode
- KT18 6NA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the setting of the nearby Grade II listed building, The Manor House
- if the appeal scheme is found to be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances needed to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that fails to meet the criteria for grey belt development, causes moderate harm to openness and harm to character, appearance and heritage setting, with no other considerations that clearly outweigh these harms to establish very special circumstances.
The harm to the Green Belt's openness, character and appearance of the AGLV, and less than substantial harm to the listed building setting were not clearly outweighed by the private benefits and temporary nature of the storage containers, and very special circumstances were not established.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN9Policy EN8Policy EN1Policy EN4Policy EN6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Policy TR3Policy GB2Policy HE6
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005150Parcel of Land Adjacent to the Manor House, Headley Common Road, Headley, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®