Planning appeal decision
Parcel of Land Adjacent to the Manor House, Headley Common Road, Headley, KT18 6NA
Planning appeal 6005150 at Parcel of Land Adjacent to the Manor House, Headley Common Road, Headley, KT18 6NA (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 9 September 2026 by Inspector B Pattison, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any other relevant development plan policies.
Change of use and conversion of existing redundant stables to one bedroom dwelling
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- B Pattison
- Postcode
- KT18 6NA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any other relevant development plan policies
- whether the site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to local and national planning policy, and the accessibility of the site to services, employment opportunities and facilities
- whether the future occupiers of the proposal would have acceptable living conditions
- whether the proposal would secure satisfactory Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)
- if the appeal scheme is found to be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances needed to justify the development
What decided it
The cumulative effect of the proposal's failure to meet internal space standards (contrary to Policy DP3.3 of the Framework), its location in an unsustainable position contrary to the spatial strategy, and its failure to deliver policy-compliant biodiversity net gain outweighed the moderate benefits of housing supply and building reuse.
the moderate benefits of housing supply and reuse of an underutilised building were substantially outweighed by the significant harm resulting from conflicts with design standards, spatial strategy and biodiversity requirements
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN1Policy S1Policy HO11Policy H10Policy EN4Policy EN9
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®