Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 December 20213275810

The Drysalters, Elland Road, Leeds, LS11 8AX

Planning appeal 3275810 at The Drysalters, Elland Road, Leeds, LS11 8AX (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 14 December 2021 by Inspector Coyne C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would result in the unacceptable loss of a community facility and local service.

Demolition of Public House and Erection of Drive-Through Coffee Shop

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Coyne C
Postcode
LS11 8AX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would result in the unacceptable loss of a community facility and local service
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area having regard to trees
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety

What decided it

The unacceptable loss of a valued community facility and the material harm to character and appearance through tree damage were not outweighed by the absence of highway safety harm.

The benefits of the drive-through coffee shop did not outweigh the significant harm caused by the loss of a community facility and material harm to character and appearance through tree damage.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P12 of the adopted Core Strategysaved policy LD1 of the Unitary Development Plan Reviewsaved policy GP5 of the Unitary Development Plan Reviewpolicy T2 of the Core Strategypolicy EN8 of the Core Strategy
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 93

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

63 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012772
    Lovell Park Hub, Wintoun Street, Leeds, LS7 1DA
  2. Dismissed20 October 20266012588
    Index House, 70 Burley Road, Leeds, LS3 1JX
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266012022
    5 Robins Grove, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0LE
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266010100
    Vacant Site, Ings Grove, Guiseley, LS20 9FR
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266010414
    Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.