Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 September 20213275885

94 Carshalton Park Road, CARSHALTON, SM5 3SW

erection of a part one part two storey side/ front extension

Authority
London Borough of Sutton
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Langford-Tejrar K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area; including whether the proposals make adequate provision for tree protection and whether the proposals conserve or enhance the significance of Park Hill Conservation Area

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the host building, surrounding area and the setting of the Park Hill Conservation Area, combined with inadequate tree protection measures, was not outweighed by the limited private benefit of increased residential accommodation.

The less than substantial harm to character, appearance and heritage setting was not outweighed by the limited private benefit of increased residential accommodation.

Plan policies cited: Policy 28, Policy 29, Policy D4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.