Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision20 December 20213275999

13-14 Maiden Lane, London, WC2E 7NE

illuminated fascia, projecting and menu sign

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Indermaur S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the fascia sign and projecting sign on the visual amenity of the area

What decided it

The fascia and projecting signs would harm visual amenity and fail to preserve or enhance the conservation area character, whereas the menu sign would preserve amenity and respect the local context.

The commercial benefits of the fascia and projecting signs were outweighed by the harm to visual amenity and the conservation area; the menu sign presented no such conflict and was allowed.

Plan policies cited: Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 43

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.