Planning appeal decision
13-14 Maiden Lane, London, WC2E 7NE
illuminated fascia, projecting and menu sign
- Authority
- City of Westminster Council
- Appeal type
- commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- advertisement · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Indermaur S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the fascia sign and projecting sign on the visual amenity of the area
What decided it
The fascia and projecting signs would harm visual amenity and fail to preserve or enhance the conservation area character, whereas the menu sign would preserve amenity and respect the local context.
The commercial benefits of the fascia and projecting signs were outweighed by the harm to visual amenity and the conservation area; the menu sign presented no such conflict and was allowed.
Plan policies cited: Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 43
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®