Planning appeal decision
Land at Rawtenstall Bank - HX7 6DB, Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire, HX7 6DB
Planning appeal 3276107 at Land at Rawtenstall Bank - HX7 6DB, Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire, HX7 6DB (Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 October 2021 by Inspector Hitchcock R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and the relevant development plan policy.
a small straw bale off-grid house
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Hitchcock R
- Postcode
- HX7 6DB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and the relevant development plan policy
- whether or not the proposal would provide a suitable location for housing
- the effect of the proposed building on the character and appearance of the locality
- whether or not the development would preserve biodiversity interests
- the effect of the development on highway safety
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt's openness and permanence, combined with the unsustainable location, landscape harm, incomplete ecological assessment, and highway safety concerns, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of the scheme, such that very special circumstances did not exist to justify the development.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt's spatial and visual openness, significant harm to character and appearance, potential harm to protected biodiversity, poor accessibility to services, and highway safety concerns were not outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery, sustainable construction, and community learning, resulting in dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GNE1Policy GP2Policy BE5Policy NE12Policy BE1Policy NE14Policy NE15Policy NE16Policy NE17Policy NE19Policy H9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 13Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Calderdale
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed22 October 20266012724Mona Cottage, 1 Dewsbury Road, Elland, HX5 9JU
- Allowed12 October 2026600957629 Syke Lane, Lightcliffe, Brighouse, HX3 8SY
- Dismissed9 October 20266008120Ashdene, Syke Lane, Ogden, Halifax, HX2 9NU
- Dismissed3 September 20266008062Land North of Helm Farm Cottages, Helm Lane, Triangle, Sowerby Bridge, HX6 3DU
- Allowed1 September 20266010078Windmill Court County House, Keighley Road, Illingworth,, Halifax, HX2 8YB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®