Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 December 20213276135

520 Gale Street, DAGENHAM, RM9 4UR

Relocation of front entrance door to the front including a canopy

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Langford-Tejrar K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling, host terrace and surrounding area

What decided it

No benefits arising from the scheme were identified to outweigh the very limited, less than substantial harm to the character and significance of the non-designated heritage asset.

The minimal harm to the non-designated heritage asset was not outweighed by any identified benefits from the proposed development.

Plan policies cited: Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021, Policy CP2 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy, Policy CP3 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy, Policy BP2 of the Local Development Framework Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DPD, Policy BP8 of the Local Development Framework Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DPD, Policy BP11 of the Local Development Framework Borough Wide Development Plan Policies DPD

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.