Planning appeal decision
4 Harvil Road, Ickenham, Uxbridge, UB10 8AJ
Planning appeal 3276162 at 4 Harvil Road, Ickenham, Uxbridge, UB10 8AJ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 25 October 2021 by Inspector Troy D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the area.
part single storey/part two storey side and rear extension incorporating roof alterations. Widening of existing vehicular access
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Troy D
- Postcode
- UB10 8AJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the area
- the highway safety in the area
What decided it
The substantial bulk and out-of-character appearance of the proposed side extension and roof alterations, which would fail to achieve appropriate subordination to the host property and would be prominently visible from public vantage points, causing unacceptable harm that outweighed the absence of highway safety harm.
The lack of harm to highway safety was significantly outweighed by the substantial harm to the character and appearance of the host property and the area.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 1 Strategic Policies 2012Policy DMHB11 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHB12 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMHD1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMT2 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020Policy DMT6 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 Development Management Policies 2020
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 112
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed27 October 202660153104 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
- Dismissed27 October 2026600985618-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
- Dismissed21 October 2026601178225 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
- Dismissed19 October 20266011268364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
- Allowed6 October 2026601385888 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®