Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 February 20223276293

Land to the North of Jepps Lane, Barton, Preston, PR3 5AQ

residential development for up to 125 no. dwellings. This

Authority
Preston City Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Price J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be appropriate, when assessed against the policies in the development plan.

What decided it

The proposal's clear conflict with the up-to-date spatial strategy policies (CS Policy 1 and PLP Policy EN1), to which substantial weight and harm was attached, outweighed the benefits of the scheme.

the significant weight attached to housing supply and affordable housing benefits, together with lesser weight given to other benefits, did not outweigh the substantial weight and harm attributed to the proposal's conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy

Framework references: 11, 12, 74, 78, 79, 80, 174, 219

Plan policies cited: CS Policy 1, PLP Policy AD1(b), PLP Policy EN1, CS Policy 4, CS Policy 7, PLP Policy HS4, PLP Policy HS5

Judgments cited: Wavendon Properties Limited v SSHCLG and Milton Keynes Council [2019] EWHC 1524 (Admin); Anita Colman v SoSCLG [2013] EWHC 1138; Borough of Telford and Wrekin v SoSCLG and Gladman Developments Limited [2016] EWHC 3073 (Admin); Eastleigh BC v SoSCLG [2019] EWHC 1862 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.