Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 February 20223276293

Land to the North of Jepps Lane, Barton, Preston, PR3 5AQ

Planning appeal 3276293 at Land to the North of Jepps Lane, Barton, Preston, PR3 5AQ (Preston City Council) was dismissed on 17 February 2022 by Inspector Price J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be appropriate, when assessed against the policies in the development plan.

residential development for up to 125 no. dwellings. This

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Price J
Postcode
PR3 5AQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be appropriate, when assessed against the policies in the development plan.

What decided it

The proposal's clear conflict with the up-to-date spatial strategy policies (CS Policy 1 and PLP Policy EN1), to which substantial weight and harm was attached, outweighed the benefits of the scheme.

the significant weight attached to housing supply and affordable housing benefits, together with lesser weight given to other benefits, did not outweigh the substantial weight and harm attributed to the proposal's conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS Policy 1PLP Policy AD1(b)PLP Policy EN1CS Policy 4CS Policy 7PLP Policy HS4PLP Policy HS5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 74Paragraph 78Paragraph 79Paragraph 80Paragraph 174Paragraph 219
Judgments
Wavendon Properties Limited v SSHCLG and Milton Keynes Council [2019] EWHC 1524 (Admin); Anita Colman v SoSCLG [2013] EWHC 1138; Borough of Telford and Wrekin v SoSCLG and Gladman Developments Limited [2016] EWHC 3073 (Admin); Eastleigh BC v SoSCLG [2019] EWHC 1862 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Preston

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 September 20266012249
    Land Outside 81 Fishergate, Preston, PR1 2UH
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266012248
    Land Outside 81 Fishergate, Preston, PR1 2UH
  3. Dismissed28 September 20266009669
    10 Broadgate, Preston, PR1 8DX
  4. Dismissed25 September 20266006018
    454 Blackpool Road, Preston, PR2 1HX
  5. Allowed10 August 20266003578
    Land to the South of Whittingham Lane & West of James Towers Way, Broughton, Preston, PR3 5DD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.