Planning appeal decision
The Cottage, 1 Cooks Hole Road, Enfield, EN2 0UD
Planning appeal 3276311 at The Cottage, 1 Cooks Hole Road, Enfield, EN2 0UD (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 13 October 2021 by Inspector Plenty B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
the erection of an oak framed ancillary annex
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Plenty B
- Postcode
- EN2 0UD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed outbuilding on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Clay Hill Conservation Area (CHCA)
- whether the proposed development would be tantamount to the creation of a separate dwelling and if so the policy implications of this
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances to justify it
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with moderate harm to openness and less than substantial harm to the conservation area, was not clearly outweighed by the limited private benefits to the occupiers.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt and moderate harm to openness, together with less than substantial harm to the conservation area, were not outweighed by the limited private benefits to the occupiers, so very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP33Policy DMD 82Policy G2Policy D4Policy HC1Policy CP30Policy CP31Policy DMD12Policy DMD37Policy DMD44Policy DMD84Policy D3Policy D6Policy DMD8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 149Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 56Paragraph 147Paragraph 148
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Notice varied and upheld4 June 20263336794Land on West Side of Burnt Farm Ride, Enfield, EN2 9DY
- Dismissed15 April 20266003581Durants Park, Former Public Toilets Site, Hertford Road, Enfield, EN3 5JF
- Notice upheld22 August 20253340557Drayton Nursery, Cattlegate Road, Enfield, Please Select A Region, State Or Province., EN2 9DJ
- Notice upheld22 August 20253340506Drayton Nursery, Cattlegate Road, Enfield, EN2 9DJ
- Dismissed20 June 20243326358Parkside House , Ferny HIll, Barnet, EN4 0QA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®