Planning appeal decision
Parkside House , Ferny HIll, Barnet, EN4 0QA
Planning appeal 3326358 at Parkside House , Ferny HIll, Barnet, EN4 0QA (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 20 June 2024 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies and the effect on openness.
redevelopment of the site to provide 7 x bungalows
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Townend K
- Postcode
- EN4 0QA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies and the effect on openness
- the effect of the proposal on heritage assets
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would result in significant spatial harm to the openness of the Green Belt by introducing development across much of the site currently comprising landscaped gardens, which would not be clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing supply or other considerations, and no very special circumstances exist to justify the development.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt openness and harm to the non-designated heritage asset were not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing supply, social and economic benefits, and optimisation of site capacity; the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework did not apply because the Green Belt policies provided a clear reason for refusal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 33Policy DMD 82Policy G2Core Policy 31Policy D3Policy DMD 7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 142Paragraph 209Paragraph 196Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Notice varied and upheld4 June 20263336794Land on West Side of Burnt Farm Ride, Enfield, EN2 9DY
- Dismissed15 April 20266003581Durants Park, Former Public Toilets Site, Hertford Road, Enfield, EN3 5JF
- Notice upheld22 August 20253340557Drayton Nursery, Cattlegate Road, Enfield, Please Select A Region, State Or Province., EN2 9DJ
- Notice upheld22 August 20253340506Drayton Nursery, Cattlegate Road, Enfield, EN2 9DJ
- Allowed21 November 20223295376Jubilee Cottage, Enfield Road, Enfield, EN2 7HU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®