Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 June 20243326358

Parkside House , Ferny HIll, BARNET, EN4 0QA

redevelopment of the site to provide 7 x bungalows

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Townend K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies and the effect on openness
  • the effect of the proposal on heritage assets
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would result in significant spatial harm to the openness of the Green Belt by introducing development across much of the site currently comprising landscaped gardens, which would not be clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing supply or other considerations, and no very special circumstances exist to justify the development.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt openness and harm to the non-designated heritage asset were not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing supply, social and economic benefits, and optimisation of site capacity; the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework did not apply because the Green Belt policies provided a clear reason for refusal.

Framework references: 154, 142, 209, 196, 11

Plan policies cited: Core Policy 33, Policy DMD 82, Policy G2, Core Policy 31, Policy D3, Policy DMD 7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.