Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 February 20223276402

46 Holland Park Avenue, London, W11 3QY

Planning appeal 3276402 at 46 Holland Park Avenue, London, W11 3QY (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was allowed on 10 February 2022 by Inspector Edginton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the details submitted are sufficient and acceptable for the conditions to be discharged, having regard to the conditions themselves and the reasons for imposing those conditions.

Demolition of rear extension and rebuild taller and narrower extension with single storey in-fill extension at lower ground floor and internal alterations; discharge of conditions relating to closet wing doors, bronze infill cladding, brickwork pointing, and secondary glazing

Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Edginton A
Postcode
W11 3QY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the details submitted are sufficient and acceptable for the conditions to be discharged, having regard to the conditions themselves and the reasons for imposing those conditions

What decided it

For Appeals A and B, the neutral heritage impact of the proposed details; for Appeals C and D, the less than substantial harm to the listed building's special architectural and historic interest, which was not outweighed by the minor private benefits of improved heat retention and soundproofing.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CL4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 200Paragraph 202Paragraph 16

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 811 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929
    Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ
  2. Allowed23 June 20263362698
    Flat 1 at 28 Brunswick Gardens and Flat 2 at 30 Brunswick Gardens, London, W8 4AL
  3. Dismissed15 June 20266001948
    Land to End of Ledbury Mews West, London, W11 2QZ
  4. Dismissed2 June 20263376699
    Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR
  5. Dismissed19 May 20266003102
    Kensington High Street, Outside No. 254, London, W8 6ND

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.