Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 February 20223276404

46 Holland Park Avenue, LONDON, W11 3QY

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Edginton A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the details submitted are sufficient and acceptable for the conditions to be discharged, having regard to the conditions themselves and the reasons for imposing those conditions

What decided it

For Appeals A and B, the works had neutral impact on heritage assets and preserved their significance. For Appeals C and D, the works caused less than substantial harm that could not be justified by the minor public benefits of improved thermal and acoustic performance.

Framework references: 200, 202, 16

Plan policies cited: CL4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.