Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 February 20223276407

46 Holland Park Avenue, LONDON, W11 3QY

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Edginton A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the details submitted are sufficient and acceptable for the conditions to be discharged, having regard to the conditions themselves and the reasons for imposing those conditions

What decided it

For Appeals A and B, the neutral heritage impact of the proposed details enabled discharge of conditions; for Appeals C and D, the insufficient detail provided and less than substantial harm to heritage significance, with only minor private benefits and no public benefits of sufficient weight, justified dismissal.

Framework references: 200, 202, 16

Plan policies cited: CL4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.