Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 January 20223276477

69 High Street, Ruislip, HA4 8JB

Planning appeal 3276477 at 69 High Street, Ruislip, HA4 8JB (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 28 January 2022 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building, street scene and the Ruislip Village Conservation Area (RVCA).

an extension at the front of the property above the shopfront to provide 1 x self-contained flat above (use class C3) at second floor level, and erection of a new three storey building at the rear of the property to provide 2 x self-contained flats (use class C3) above an open loading bay; with associated bin and cycle store

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McDonagh C
Postcode
HA4 8JB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building, street scene and the Ruislip Village Conservation Area (RVCA)
  • The effects of the proposed three-storey building to the rear on the living conditions of occupiers of No's 1 and 3 Midcroft with regards to overlooking
  • Whether the proposed three-storey building would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers regarding outlook and daylight

What decided it

The cumulative harm to the conservation area, neighbouring amenity through overlooking, and future occupiers' outlook could not be justified by the limited public benefits of three additional residential units.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
BE1HE1DMHB1DMHB4DMHB11DMHB12D4HC1D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 207

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

420 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266015310
    4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266011782
    25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011268
    364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
  5. Allowed6 October 20266013858
    88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.