Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 January 20223276477

69 High Street, RUISLIP, HA4 8JB

an extension at the front of the property above the shopfront to provide 1 x self-contained flat above (use class C3) at second floor level, and erection of a new three storey building at the rear of the property to provide 2 x self-contained flats (use class C3) above an open loading bay; with associated bin and cycle store

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McDonagh C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building, street scene and the Ruislip Village Conservation Area (RVCA)
  • The effects of the proposed three-storey building to the rear on the living conditions of occupiers of No's 1 and 3 Midcroft with regards to overlooking
  • Whether the proposed three-storey building would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers regarding outlook and daylight

What decided it

The cumulative harm to the conservation area, neighbouring amenity through overlooking, and future occupiers' outlook could not be justified by the limited public benefits of three additional residential units.

Framework references: 199, 202, 207

Plan policies cited: BE1, HE1, DMHB1, DMHB4, DMHB11, DMHB12, D4, HC1, D6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.