Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 December 20213276646

Flat 3, 17 Castle Hill Avenue, Folkestone, Kent, CT20 2TD

replacement of 4 single glazed timber sash windows with double glazed uPVC windows and replacement of 5 single glazed timber sash windows with modern double glazed uPVC sash windows

Authority
Folkestone and Hythe District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Lawrence E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and the Folkestone, Leas and Bayle Conservation Area

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the Folkestone, Leas and Bayle Conservation Area caused by the introduction of bulkier uPVC frames with different texture and finish, which would undermine the historic character and appearance of the host villa and the row of villas, was not outweighed by the energy efficiency and maintenance benefits claimed.

The harm to the significance of the conservation area, characterised as less than substantial, was weighed against the public benefits of energy efficiency and building maintenance, and the harm clearly outweighed these benefits.

Framework references: 126, 130, 189, 199, 200, 201, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy HE1, Policy HB1, Policy HB8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.