®Planning appeal decision
Thrift Farm Barn Horkesley Hill, Nayland, Colchester, CO6 4JP
Planning appeal 3276830 at Thrift Farm Barn Horkesley Hill, Nayland, Colchester, CO6 4JP (Colchester Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 July 2022 by Inspector Wyatt G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the developments on the character and appearance of the area, including the Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and the setting of the adjacent listed barn.
to retain six underground containers (coloured pink on the photograph) whose purpose is to support the earth bank to the south of the new workshop and to protect the mature oak tree on the south east boundary. 2. To retain a parking area for approximately fifteen to twenty vehicles on the land to the south of the site (coloured green on the photograph). Please note in excess of fifty trees were planted in January 2019 which will reduce visual impact along the western boundary, on the top of the earth bank and on the eastern road boundary (marked with crosses on the photograph). They are a mixture of native species, listed in the attached Woodland Trust information sheet”
- Authority
- Colchester Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Wyatt G
- Postcode
- CO6 4JP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the developments on the character and appearance of the area, including the Dedham Vale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and the setting of the adjacent listed barn
What decided it
The parking area and underground containers in Appeal A represented new development that failed to conserve or enhance the landscape character of the AONB and harmed its integrity, whereas the office building and storage containers in Appeals B and C were read as part of the existing business cluster and caused no such harm.
The Inspector applied great weight to conserving the AONB as required by NPPF paragraph 176, finding that the office building and containers could be retained consistently with this protection and business expansion under NPPF paragraph 84, but that the parking area and underground containers could not be justified within the AONB's highest protection status.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP9Policy UR2Policy EV1Policy DP1Policy DP14Policy DP22
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 176Paragraph 84
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Colchester City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed19 October 20266009296Land West of Priory Road, Tiptree, Colchester, CO5 0QE
- Allowed8 October 20266009395Land North of Coggeshall Road, Marks Tey, Colchester, CO6 1LT
- Dismissed2 October 202660050147 East Mersea Road, West Mersea, CO5 8SL
- Dismissed2 October 202660050117 East Mersea Road, West Mersea, CO5 8SL
- Allowed24 September 20266009382Land at Colchester Rd, Colchester, CO6 3JX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.