Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 February 20223276991

Land between 133 – 147 Burwood Road, Hersham, KT12 4AN

described on the application form as, “Development of site to provide 3-5 residential units

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Doherty A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development, with particular regard to whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness is not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of limited housing delivery in the context of a shortfall in supply.

the moderate weight given to housing supply benefits does not clearly outweigh the substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt, so very special circumstances do not exist

Framework references: 11, 124, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy DM17, Policy CS1, Policy CS5

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham BC [2015] EWCA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.