Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 February 20223277182

94 Brighton Road, Horley, RH6 7JQ

Planning appeal 3277182 at 94 Brighton Road, Horley, RH6 7JQ (Reigate and Banstead Borough Council) was dismissed on 21 February 2022 by Inspector Redford R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the future occupants of the proposed ground floor studio flat, in relation to light and outlook.

extension, alteration and addition of residential accommodation to the existing building on 94 Brighton Road. The proposal would provide an additional 6 No. self contained flats. The existing flat at first floor and retail unit at ground floor will be retained. The existing car park at the rear is also retained and this will provide space for parking, refuse and recycling which are all accessed from Lumley Road

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Redford R
Postcode
RH6 7JQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the future occupants of the proposed ground floor studio flat, in relation to light and outlook
  • parking provision

What decided it

The harm to living conditions of future occupants of the proposed ground floor studio flat through inadequate light and poor outlook could not be outweighed by acceptable parking provision.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DES1DES5TAP1CS10CS1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

73 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice upheld7 August 20263378370
    Land at Lower Duxhurst Farm, 15 Reigate Road, Sidlow, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 8QH
  2. Allowed22 July 20266006121
    75 Ferndale Road, Banstead Surrey, SM7 2EX
  3. Dismissed28 May 20263376752
    17 Woodmansterne Street, Woodmansterne, Banstead, Surrey, SM7 3NN
  4. Dismissed20 May 20266003710
    Southside, Sturts Lane, Walton On The Hill, Surrey, KT20 7RQ
  5. Dismissed19 January 20263364217
    Redhill Railway Station, Princess Way, Redhill, Surrey, RH1 1RB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.