Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed20 December 20213277189

7 Wingfield Close, BEDFORD, MK40 4PB

one and two storey side and rear extension

Authority
Bedford Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Troy D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed single and two storey rear extension on the living conditions of the occupiers of the neighbouring property at No. 9 Wingfield Close with particular regard to overshadowing and outlook

What decided it

The modest scale, design and layout of the rear extension, combined with the boundary treatment, separation distance and building orientation, would not result in unacceptable overshadowing or outlook impact on the neighbouring property.

The modest benefits of the extension to the appellant's property were balanced against the limited additional impact on neighbouring living conditions compared to the fall-back position, with the balance tipping in favour of allowing the appeal.

Framework references: 56

Plan policies cited: Policy 32 (i and iv) of the Bedford Borough Local Plan 2020, Design Code E7 of the Council's Residential Extensions, New Dwellings and Small Infill Developments Supplementary Design Guidance 2000

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.