Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 October 20213277215

18 Lockesfield Place, London, E14 3AH

Planning appeal 3277215 at 18 Lockesfield Place, London, E14 3AH (London Borough of Tower Hamlets) was dismissed on 29 October 2021 by Inspector Walker R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 17 and 19 Lockesfield Place with particular reference to daylight and outlook.

Proposed single storey and part double storey rear extension to match with the three previously approved applications in close proximity

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Walker R
Postcode
E14 3AH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 17 and 19 Lockesfield Place with particular reference to daylight and outlook
  • Character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal would result in unacceptable effects on the outlook and living conditions of neighbouring occupiers and would harm the character and appearance of the area, conflicting with the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh that conflict.

The benefits of making effective use of an existing property and increasing housing diversity were outweighed by the harm to living conditions and character and appearance, as good design is a key aspect of sustainable development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D.DH8 of the Tower Hamlets Local Plan (2020)Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021)Policy S.DH1 of the Tower Hamlets Local PlanPolicy D4 of the London Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

361 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Tower Hamlets

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice varied and upheld30 September 20263368399
    232 Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1BJ
  2. Notice varied and upheld30 September 20263361722
    48A White Horse Road, London, E1 0ND
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266011009
    7 Douro Street, London, E3 2TS
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010662
    Pavement O/S, 43-47 Bethnal Green Road, London, E1 6LA
  5. Dismissed29 September 20266010661
    Pavement O/S, 43-47 Bethnal Green Road, London, E1 6LA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.