Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20213277324

West Park, West Drive, VIRGINIA WATER, GU25 4NE

a new mansard level over the existing garage, with lead dormer windows and white painted sash windows, to provide additional storage areas

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Buchanan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policy and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The disproportionate scale of the extension, approaching double the floorspace and more than half as much in height, constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that cannot be justified by very special circumstances.

The substantial harm from inappropriateness and loss of openness to the Green Belt was not clearly outweighed by other considerations including design quality, absence of visual harm and private domestic benefits.

Framework references: 149, 137, 138

Plan policies cited: Policy EE14

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.