Planning appeal decision
West Park, West Drive, Virginia Water, GU25 4NE
Planning appeal 3277324 at West Park, West Drive, Virginia Water, GU25 4NE (Runnymede Borough Council) was dismissed on 20 December 2021 by Inspector Buchanan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policy and the National Planning Policy Framework.
a new mansard level over the existing garage, with lead dormer windows and white painted sash windows, to provide additional storage areas
- Authority
- Runnymede Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Buchanan R
- Postcode
- GU25 4NE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policy and the National Planning Policy Framework
- its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The disproportionate scale of the extension, approaching double the floorspace and more than half as much in height, constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that cannot be justified by very special circumstances.
The substantial harm from inappropriateness and loss of openness to the Green Belt was not clearly outweighed by other considerations including design quality, absence of visual harm and private domestic benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EE14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 137Paragraph 138
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed29 October 20266006748St Merryns Copse, Chobham Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0QE
- Dismissed17 August 20266008286203 Almners Road, Lyne, KT16 0BL
- Notice varied and upheld13 July 20263377703Land Adjacent to Warren Farm, Green Road, Thorpe, Surrey, TW20 8QT
- Dismissed5 May 20263376337Webbs The Green, Englefield Green, Egham, TW20 0YX
- Dismissed3 March 202660024817 Ottershaw Park, Ottershaw, KT16 0QG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®