Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 November 20213277343

15 Ballinska Mews, Gloucester, GL2 0AR

a two storey side extension

Authority
Gloucester City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Phillips B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and surrounding area
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of 16 Ballinska Mews, having particular regard to outlook and light

What decided it

The two storey front gable extension would appear as an incongruous, prominent and dominating feature that would be unsympathetic to the form and scale of the existing dwelling and would detract from the character and appearance of the surrounding area, in conflict with the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh this harm.

The harm to character and appearance was not outweighed by any other considerations, including the provisions of the Framework.

Plan policies cited: Policy SD4 of the Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy (2017), Policy A9 of the Pre-Submission Gloucester City Plan (2019), Policy SD14 of the Gloucester, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Joint Core Strategy (2017)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.