Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 March 20223277363

Lymington Shores, Bridge Road, Lymington, SO41 9BZ

Mixed use development comprised: 168 dwellings; restaurant; retail/commercial space (Use Class A1 & A2) boat club; art gallery (Use Class D1); jetty with pontoon; access alterations; pedestrian bridge over railway; riverside walkway; car parking; landscaping; drainage’ without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 11/97849, dated 14 June 2012

Authority
New Forest District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Edwards S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The main issue is therefore the effects of removing the disputed condition in the context of an appeal made under Section 73 of the Act, with particular regard to the provision of a pedestrian bridge over the railway.

What decided it

The absence of a duly executed planning obligation securing construction of the pedestrian bridge in the terms originally agreed, since the submitted Unilateral Undertakings were not an appropriate mechanism to vary the earlier Section 106 agreement.

Plan policies cited: Policy CS4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.