Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 May 20266002232

Land Rear of Kona, Sway Road, Lymington, SO41 8LR

the conversion of an existing barn to a one-bedroom home, with access as existing and two parking spaces

Authority
New Forest District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Evans J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the scheme would be inappropriate development in the green belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and local development plan policies
  • the effect of the scheme upon the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the location of the dwelling would accord with national and local policy
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances to justify the proposal

What decided it

The scheme would be inappropriate development in the green belt causing substantial harm to its openness, and the modest benefits arising from housing delivery and economic activity would not constitute very special circumstances to justify the proposal.

The substantial harm to the green belt and harm to character and appearance, weighed heavily against the proposal, outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits, environmental benefits from building re-use, and social benefits from passive surveillance, such that very special circumstances were not demonstrated.

Framework references: 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy ENV2, Policy ENV3, Policy STR3, Policy STR4, Policy HOU5, Policy DM20

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.