Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to 192 Gore Road, New Milton, Hampshire, BH25 5NQ
Planning appeal 3363504 at Land Adjacent to 192 Gore Road, New Milton, Hampshire, BH25 5NQ (New Forest District Council) was dismissed on 18 July 2025 by Inspector Law T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on protected sites, namely the New Forest Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar, the Solent and Southampton Water SPA and Ramsar, the Solent Maritime Special Area of Conservation (SAC), and the Solent and Dorset Coast SPA.
development of 2 dwellings with associated parking and bin stores. Drop kerb to be extended
- Authority
- New Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Law T
- Postcode
- BH25 5NQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on protected sites, namely the New Forest Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar, the Solent and Southampton Water SPA and Ramsar, the Solent Maritime Special Area of Conservation (SAC), and the Solent and Dorset Coast SPA
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to local and national policy
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposed development would effect the living conditions of future residents
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The failure to secure mitigation for adverse effects on European protected sites through a planning obligation, combined with the inappropriate Green Belt development and harm to openness, could not be outweighed by the limited housing and economic benefits.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriate development and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of housing supply contribution and socio-economic benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ENV1Policy ENV2Policy ENV3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 193Paragraph 194
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in New Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed28 May 20266002232Land Rear of Kona, Sway Road, Lymington, SO41 8LR
- Allowed29 April 20266005105Land at New Lane, Milford-on-Sea, SO41 0UQ
- Dismissed19 March 20266003160Little Ramley, 115 Ramley Road, Pennington, Hampshire, SO41 8LH
- Allowed13 March 20266002931Velood, Barnes Lane, Milford on Sea, Hampshire, SO41 0RR
- Dismissed16 April 20253348063Land Adjacent to Lavenham, Sway Road, Lymington, Hants , SO41 8NN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®