Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 July 20223277379

Photo Arts, 105 Burnt Oak Broadway, Edgware, HA8 5EN

Planning appeal 3277379 at Photo Arts, 105 Burnt Oak Broadway, Edgware, HA8 5EN (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 12 July 2022 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area.

a part single & two story rear extension to provide storage to GF retail & FF office space (B1 use) with associated alterations

Authority
London Borough of Harrow
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor offices/R&D/light industry
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
HA8 5EN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area
  • The living conditions of neighbouring residential occupiers, with regards to light, outlook, and privacy
  • Crime and antisocial behaviour

What decided it

The significant adverse effects on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and the living conditions of neighbouring residents regarding light, outlook and privacy could not be justified and were not outweighed by any material considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021)Policy D1 of the London Plan (2021)Policy CS1 of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012)Policy DM1 of the Harrow Council Development Management Policies (2013)Policy DM2 of the Harrow Council Development Management Policies (2013)Supplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guide (2010)Mayors Housing SPG (2016)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

615 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266006380
    Thrale Farm, 1 Oxhey Lane, Pinner, HA3 6SX
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266011336
    52 Durley Avenue, Pinner, HA5 1JH
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011223
    30 Kenmore Avenue, Kenton, HA3 8PQ
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266008284
    24 Uxbridge Road, Stanmore, Harrow, HA7 3LG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.