Planning appeal decision
4 King Henry Mews , Bolton By Bowland, CLITHEROE, Lancs, BB7 4HR
a single storey rear extension
- Authority
- Ribble Valley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Fitzsimon D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed extension on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and its setting
What decided it
The extent of rearward projection and modern design of the extension, including extensive glazing, would not respond well to the original building's form and proportions and would appear as an overly prominent and unsympathetic addition when viewed from the open land to the south.
The arguments advanced by the appellant did not outweigh the harm to character and appearance and policy conflict, therefore the appeal did not succeed.
Plan policies cited: Policy DMH5, Policy DMG1, Policy DMH4, Key Statement EN2
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®