Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 December 20213277432

33b The Cliff, Hartlepool, TS25 1AU

Planning appeal 3277432 at 33b The Cliff, Hartlepool, TS25 1AU (Hartlepool Borough Council *) was dismissed on 13 December 2021 by Inspector Hunt S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the significance of the locally listed building and the character and appearance of the Seaton Carew Conservation Area.

described by the appellant as ‘1. Strip off full roof to main house and back extension; 2. Remove all rubbish; 3. Felt and Latt full roof with breathable membrane; 4. Fit binding gutters to both side of roof; 5. Slate full roof with eternitis slate; 6. Fit dry ridge tiles to full roof and extension at back; 7. Clean and seal gutters

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hunt S
Postcode
TS25 1AU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the significance of the locally listed building and the character and appearance of the Seaton Carew Conservation Area

What decided it

The lack of evidence that natural slates cannot be reused or supplemented for the necessary repairs, combined with the disruptive visual effect of modern fibre cement tiles on the roofscape of the locally listed terrace within the Conservation Area, meant the less than substantial harm was not outweighed by the public benefits.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the non-designated and designated heritage assets was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of necessary repairs.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HE1Policy HE3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202Paragraph 15

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

9 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hartlepool

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed17 September 20266008410
    14 Elm Grove, Hartlepool, TS26 8LZ
  2. Allowed28 August 20266011212
    58 Ryehill Gardens, Hartlepool, TS26 0JJ
  3. Dismissed21 April 20266003791
    43 Kildale Grove, Hartlepool, County Durham, TS25 2AG
  4. Dismissed30 March 20263356466
    Low Throston House, Netherby Gate, Hart Lane, Hartlepool, TS26 0LF
  5. Notice varied and upheld30 March 20263344250
    Netherby Gate, Hart Lane, Hartlepool, TS26 0LF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.