Planning appeal decision
33b The Cliff, Hartlepool, TS25 1AU
Planning appeal 3277432 at 33b The Cliff, Hartlepool, TS25 1AU (Hartlepool Borough Council *) was dismissed on 13 December 2021 by Inspector Hunt S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the significance of the locally listed building and the character and appearance of the Seaton Carew Conservation Area.
described by the appellant as ‘1. Strip off full roof to main house and back extension; 2. Remove all rubbish; 3. Felt and Latt full roof with breathable membrane; 4. Fit binding gutters to both side of roof; 5. Slate full roof with eternitis slate; 6. Fit dry ridge tiles to full roof and extension at back; 7. Clean and seal gutters
- Authority
- Hartlepool Borough Council *
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Hunt S
- Postcode
- TS25 1AU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the significance of the locally listed building and the character and appearance of the Seaton Carew Conservation Area
What decided it
The lack of evidence that natural slates cannot be reused or supplemented for the necessary repairs, combined with the disruptive visual effect of modern fibre cement tiles on the roofscape of the locally listed terrace within the Conservation Area, meant the less than substantial harm was not outweighed by the public benefits.
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the non-designated and designated heritage assets was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of necessary repairs.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HE1Policy HE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 202Paragraph 15
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Hartlepool
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed17 September 2026600841014 Elm Grove, Hartlepool, TS26 8LZ
- Allowed28 August 2026601121258 Ryehill Gardens, Hartlepool, TS26 0JJ
- Dismissed21 April 2026600379143 Kildale Grove, Hartlepool, County Durham, TS25 2AG
- Dismissed30 March 20263356466Low Throston House, Netherby Gate, Hart Lane, Hartlepool, TS26 0LF
- Notice varied and upheld30 March 20263344250Netherby Gate, Hart Lane, Hartlepool, TS26 0LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®