Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 February 20223277540

58-60 High Street, Berkhamsted, HP4 2BP

the demolition of existing buildings and the erection of new buildings to accommodate 6 dwellings

Authority
Dacorum Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Parsons J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of Berkhamsted Conservation Area
  • the setting of a Grade II listed building
  • the living conditions of the future occupiers of the proposed flats, having regard to the provision of outdoor space and the occupiers of 56 High Street, having regard to privacy
  • highway design and safety
  • sustainable design and construction

What decided it

The failure to preserve the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and the adverse effect on the setting of the listed building, to which considerable importance and weight must be attached under the statutory duty, outweighed the housing and economic benefits of the scheme.

The economic, social and environmental benefits of the housing development were outweighed by the less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area and the setting of the listed building, to which considerable importance and weight must be attached under sections 72(1) and 66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, together with unacceptable highway safety impacts.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: Policy CS4, Policy CS12, Policy CS18, Policy CS27, Policy CS29, Policy CS30, Policy CS31, Policy 111, Policy 120

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.