Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed18 January 20223277716

49 Wallingford Avenue, LONDON, W10 6PZ

the erection of a 3m deep rear extension

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision to refuse to issue a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded, turning on whether the proposed development would constitute permitted development under Article 3(1) and Class A of Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015

What decided it

The extension, shown on the plans as a single undivided storey of 4m height, complies with the GPDO limitations for permitted development and does not constitute a breach of limitation A.2(c) because it does not have more than a single storey.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.