Planning appeal decision
Redwings, Woodham Road, Battlesbridge, Wickford, Essex, SS11 7QL
Planning appeal 3277776 at Redwings, Woodham Road, Battlesbridge, Wickford, Essex, SS11 7QL (Chelmsford Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 25 November 2022 by Inspector King T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt and, if so, the effect on the Green Belt's openness.
Without planning permission, the material change of use of the land for the sale and storage of motor vehicles with associated development comprising the construction of a hard surface, earth bunds, perimeter fence and entrance gates
- Authority
- Chelmsford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Major retail and services
- Inspector
- King T
- Postcode
- SS11 7QL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt and, if so, the effect on the Green Belt's openness
- the effect of the development on the character of the land and the surrounding landscape
- if it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that materially harms openness, and the economic benefits and community support do not amount to very special circumstances sufficient to outweigh this harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM9Policy S8Policy S1Policy S11Policy DM10Policy DM23
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chelmsford City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Notice upheld3 August 20263347259Land at The House, East Hanningfield Road, Sandon, Chelmsford, Essex, CM2 7TQ
- Planning permission granted28 July 20263337730Former Tennis Pavillion , The Old Rodney , Spring Elms Lane, Little Baddow, Chelmsford , CM3 4SD
- Dismissed28 July 20266007350Phillips Farm, Highwood Road, Highwood, CM1 3PX
- Split Decision1 July 20263377239Highfields Farm Barn, Highfields Mead, East Hanningfield, Chelmsford , Essex, CM3 8AW
- Dismissed18 May 20266006009Emilie, Stock Road, Ingatestone, CM4 9PQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®