Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 February 20223278165

Harrys Barn, Brown Street, Old Newton, Suffolk, IP14 4QB

Planning appeal 3278165 at Harrys Barn, Brown Street, Old Newton, Suffolk, IP14 4QB (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 3 February 2022 by Inspector Cooper W, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of a) the Grade II curtilage listed building Harrys Barn and b) the Grade II listed building Ivy Cottage.

conversion and extension of cartlodge to form annexe

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cooper W
Postcode
IP14 4QB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of a) the Grade II curtilage listed building Harrys Barn and b) the Grade II listed building Ivy Cottage
  • Whether the proposed development would constitute a suitable residential annexe to meet special family needs, that is ancillary in function, modest in scale and in keeping with the original dwelling

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the setting of designated heritage assets, with public benefits insufficient to outweigh this harm under paragraph 202 of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS5 of the Mid Suffolk Core StrategyPolicy HB1 of the Mid Suffolk Local PlanPolicy H19 of the Mid Suffolk Local PlanPolicy GP1 of the Mid Suffolk Local PlanPolicy SB2 of the Mid Suffolk Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266012038
    The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
  2. Dismissed14 September 20266010281
    1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
  3. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  4. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
    Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.