Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 October 20213278178

40 Thurlstone Road, RUISLIP, HA4 0BT

Double Storey Side Infill Extension, Part Double Storey Part Single Storey Rear Extension, Loft Conversion, with insertion of rooflights, Render finish, to original house to match proposed extensions

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Scott A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area

What decided it

The proposed roof formation would result in uncharacteristic and visually obtrusive development that would harm the character and appearance of the host dwelling, the row of houses, and the local area, conflicting with the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh this harm.

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part One - Strategic Policies 2012, Policy DMHB 11 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part Two - Development Management Policies 2020, Policy DMHB 12 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part Two - Development Management Policies 2020, Policy DMHD 1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part Two - Development Management Policies 2020

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.