Planning appeal decision
Land at Bardfield Road, Shalford, Essex, CM7 5HX
Planning appeal 3278776 at Land at Bardfield Road, Shalford, Essex, CM7 5HX (Braintree District Council) was dismissed on 17 June 2022 by Inspector Small M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is an appropriate location for housing including, having regard to national planning policy, whether the site is in an isolated location.
change of use of land for the siting of a temporary dwelling, together with stables, agricultural building & associated hardstanding & turn out/exercise area to support a new equestrian business
- Authority
- Braintree District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Change of use
- Inspector
- Small M
- Postcode
- CM7 5HX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is an appropriate location for housing including, having regard to national planning policy, whether the site is in an isolated location
- whether there is a need for a rural worker to live permanently on the site, with regard to the nature of the proposed facility
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on the appearance and use of Hulls Lane, including safety
What decided it
The proposal's conflict with the development plan—arising from its isolated location, unproven essential need for a rural worker's dwelling, and harm to character, appearance and the Protected Lane—was not outweighed by other material considerations.
The conflict with the development plan (isolated location, unjustified need, harm to character/appearance and to Hulls Lane) was given significant weight and was not outweighed by the support for the facility or its limited economic benefits, so the appeal was dismissed in accordance with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS7RLP 85LPP 54LPP 40RLP 80RLP 90CS8SP7SP1RLP 87LPP 46
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 48Paragraph 80Paragraph 84Paragraph 11Paragraph 197Paragraph 219
- Judgments
- Braintree District Council v SSCLG & Ors [2017] EWHC 2743 (Admin); City and Country Bramshill Ltd v SSHCLG, Hart DC and Historic England [2019] EWHC 3237 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Braintree District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed28 October 20266008511Rose Cottage Church Road, Terling, CM3 2PH
- Dismissed20 October 2026600854161 Aparthotel At Kings Road, Halstead, CO9 1HA
- Dismissed12 October 20266014774Land South of Pen-Lan, Bures, CO8 5DL
- Dismissed12 October 202660127499 Kemsley Road, Earls Colne, CO6 2NU
- Dismissed9 October 20266006918Wards Farm, Gladfen Hall Road, Greenstead Green, CO9 1RN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®