Planning appeal decision
1 St. Dunstans Hill, Cheam, Sutton, SM1 2JR
Planning appeal 3279301 at 1 St. Dunstans Hill, Cheam, Sutton, SM1 2JR (London Borough of Sutton) was dismissed on 17 March 2022 by Inspector Davies E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed extension would constitute permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO.
a single storey rear extension projecting from the rear of the original house by 5.3m
- Authority
- London Borough of Sutton
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Davies E
- Postcode
- SM1 2JR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed extension would constitute permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO
What decided it
The proposed extension's width exceeds the permitted development limit under paragraph A.1(j)(iii) of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO, as it extends beyond the side elevation wall and is wider than half the width of the original dwellinghouse.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Sutton
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed19 October 20266002198103 Marlow Drive, North Cheam, SM3 9BD
- Allowed15 October 20266009820Grass Verge of Sparrow Farm Road, London, KT17 2DF
- Dismissed27 August 2026600526985 Priory Road, North Cheam, SM3 8LY
- Dismissed7 August 202660081243 Carshalton Grove, Sutton, SM1 4LY
- Dismissed27 July 20266006764136 Grove Road, Sutton, Sutton, SM1 2DF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®