Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed17 September 20213279360

22 Oakridge Avenue, Menston, ILKLEY, West Yorkshire, LS29 6DF

two-storey side extension and part single, part two-storey rear extension, permitted development hip to gable roof extension and rear dormer

Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Caines A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area
  • the effect upon the living conditions of the occupiers of 23 Oakridge Avenue with particular regard to outlook and light

What decided it

The fallback position of the previously approved 3m rear extension scheme, to which the Inspector afforded significant weight as a real prospect of implementation, meant that the additional 2m depth would not unacceptably harm the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers.

The modest additional harm to neighbouring outlook and light from the extended depth, when compared against the fallback position and the absence of harm to character and appearance, tipped in favour of allowing the appeal.

Plan policies cited: Policy DS1, Policy DS3, Policy DS5, Bradford Core Strategy 2017

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.